From: | "James Adams" <pornstarbatman(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tomasz Myrta" <jasiek(at)klaster(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Selecting * from the base table but getting the inheriteds |
Date: | 2002-10-30 09:25:17 |
Message-ID: | OE26Qx6QC3gYKOvN5wL0000a19a@hotmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Yea it would be easier to have everything in one table filling unused with
nulls, but I was trying to avoid that because of the wasted space.
But I think I'll do it that way after all :~]
Thanks for your help
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomasz Myrta" <jasiek(at)klaster(dot)net>
To: "James Adams" <pornstarbatman(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [SQL] Selecting * from the base table but getting the
inheriteds
> Uz.ytkownik James Adams napisa?:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a "baseTable". I have a number of decendantTables that INHERIT
> > from the base table.
> >
> > I want to do somthing like
> >
> > =>select * from baseTable;
> >
> > But I want it to return the data in the all the descendant tables along
> > with the extra column that they contain. How do I do this?
> >
>
> select
> *,
> cast(null as varchar) as another_field1,
> cast(null as int4) as another_field2
> from only basetable
> union
> select
> *
> from descent_table
>
> Isn't it easier to just create baseTable with the same columns as
> descent tables (and fill them with nulls)?
>
> Tomasz Myrta
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adam Witney | 2002-10-30 09:42:20 | Re: Creating Stored Procedures |
Previous Message | Bhuvan A | 2002-10-30 09:15:41 | Re: Database Design tool |