| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |
| Date: | 2002-09-10 02:11:49 |
| Message-ID: | 200209100211.g8A2BnA03165@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> We should surely keep this on a much more technical level and avoid any
> personal offendings. To do so, please explain to me why you think that
> triggers and constraints are out of focus here? What is the difference
> between a trigger, a rule and an instead rule from a business process
> oriented point of view? I think there is none at all. They are just
> different techniques to do one and the same, implement business logic in
> the database system.
All the problems here are coming from INSTEAD rules. We don't have
INSTEAD triggers or contraints.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-10 02:13:20 | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-10 02:10:21 | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |