Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Date: 2002-09-10 02:13:20
Message-ID: 200209100213.g8A2DKu03363@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Steve Howe wrote:
> Because the affected commands are supposed to give you back
> information on what your INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE commands, not what is
> making behind the scenes.
>
> And it seems that other people in the thread agree with me, please
> read thread.
>
> Since you are probably very familiar with the rules system, why don't
> you vote on a proposal too, or just suggest yours. Your opinion is
> very important. I'm not saying I'm the truth owner; I'm just another
> developer who needs a feature working again.

Jan actually did vote in the first round which appears in TODO.detail.
He voted that if the INSTEAD rule had only _one_ statement, return that,
if not, return nothing.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-09-10 02:16:47 Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-10 02:11:49 Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue