Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Steve Howe <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Date: 2002-09-10 02:10:21
Message-ID: 200209100210.g8A2ALX03093@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Actually, this problem is part of a whole scope of problems that were in
the Berkeley code, because rules, and inheritance, just have a certain
contorting effect on SQL queries where it is difficult to get them
working properly.

If these features didn't come from Berkeley, I doubt we would have ever
implemented them, so in some case there are inherited bugs from features
that weren't 100% thought out when they were added many years ago.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-10 02:11:49 Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Previous Message snpe 2002-09-10 02:08:01 Re: problem with new autocommit config parameter and jdbc