| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Iavor Raytchev <iavor(dot)raytchev(at)verysmall(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |
| Date: | 2002-08-31 12:38:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20020831203739.G75164-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> > What do people think about this. Is it so bad that the own data is
> > stored in the database pgaccess works with?
> >
>
> I don't particularly like it. Oracle deals with this by having a
> database unto itself as a management repository (Oracle Enterprise
> Manager, OEM, I believe). You register the database you want to manage
> with the repository, and the metadata is kept there instead of in each
> managed database.
These days you could create a schema in the database you're managing as
well...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2002-08-31 16:28:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed GUC Variable |
| Previous Message | Zhicong Leo Liang | 2002-08-31 12:28:53 | serial type as foreign key referential integrity violation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Iavor Raytchev | 2002-08-31 17:55:49 | pgaccess 0.98.8 beta 1 - the show starts |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-08-30 20:02:51 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |