| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Iavor Raytchev <iavor(dot)raytchev(at)verysmall(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data |
| Date: | 2002-08-30 15:51:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3D6F9490.9040507@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> There is an open question we need broad opinion on.
>
> Currently pgaccess stores its own data in the database it works with.
> Some people do not like that. To store it elsewhere invokes a number of
> issues such as:
>
> - where is this somewhere
> - converting form all versions to the new
> - etc.
>
> What do people think about this. Is it so bad that the own data is
> stored in the database pgaccess works with?
>
I don't particularly like it. Oracle deals with this by having a
database unto itself as a management repository (Oracle Enterprise
Manager, OEM, I believe). You register the database you want to manage
with the repository, and the metadata is kept there instead of in each
managed database.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-30 15:56:47 | make failure on cvs tip |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-08-30 15:50:52 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-08-30 15:58:35 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-08-30 15:50:52 | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |