| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Date: | 2002-08-11 09:38:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20020811173841.N67113-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3. At this point, we better decide
> > which one we prefer.
> >
> > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage. If we go to
> > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> > problems.
>
> I guess I'd also agree with:
> FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
> NAMEDATALEN 64
> and work on the performance issues for 7.4.
I agree too.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-11 09:43:28 | Re: python patch |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-11 09:31:03 | Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness |