| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Date: | 2002-08-11 01:20:37 |
| Message-ID: | 3D55BBE5.9050605@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, seems we have not come to a decision yet on this.
>
> Do we have agreement to increate FUNC_MAX_ARGS to 32?
>
> NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3. At this point, we better decide
> which one we prefer.
>
> The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage. If we go to
> 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> problems.
I guess I'd also agree with:
FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
NAMEDATALEN 64
and work on the performance issues for 7.4.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-11 02:41:57 | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-11 00:22:38 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |