Re: Open 7.3 items

From: nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org (Neil Conway)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-07-31 19:38:38
Message-ID: 20020731193838.GB27143@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:30:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, we need someone to benchmark both the NAMEDATALEN and FUNC_MAX_ARGS
> to prove we are not causing performance problems. Once that is done,
> the default limits can be easily increased. I was thinking 64 for
> NAMEDATALEN and 32 for FUNC_MAX_ARGS, effectively doubling both.

If we're going to change NAMEDATALEN, we should probably set it to 128,
as that's what SQL99 requires.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 19:48:04 Re: Open 7.3 items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-31 19:37:07 Re: Open 7.3 items