| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-07-31 20:53:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200207312053.g6VKrRY19766@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:30:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes, we need someone to benchmark both the NAMEDATALEN and FUNC_MAX_ARGS
> > to prove we are not causing performance problems. Once that is done,
> > the default limits can be easily increased. I was thinking 64 for
> > NAMEDATALEN and 32 for FUNC_MAX_ARGS, effectively doubling both.
>
> If we're going to change NAMEDATALEN, we should probably set it to 128,
> as that's what SQL99 requires.
OK, updated to show only 128. Do we need more performance testing? I
am unclear on that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-31 20:54:35 | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-31 20:47:58 | Re: Open 7.3 items |