| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-07-31 19:37:07 |
| Message-ID: | 18524.1028144227@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, we need someone to benchmark both the NAMEDATALEN and FUNC_MAX_ARGS
> to prove we are not causing performance problems. Once that is done,
> the default limits can be easily increased. I was thinking 64 for
> NAMEDATALEN and 32 for FUNC_MAX_ARGS, effectively doubling both.
The SQL spec says NAMEDATALEN shall be 128 (or at least 128, too lazy
to look). If we're gonna change it then I think we should really try
to go to 128.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-07-31 19:38:38 | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-31 19:30:30 | Re: Open 7.3 items |