From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |
Date: | 2002-04-16 03:21:03 |
Message-ID: | 200204160321.g3G3L3M02941@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > >
> > > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > > Is there any consensus on it ?
> >
> > Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems; see TODO
> > dependency checking section.
>
> Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
> e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
> referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
> So I've thought pg_depend is for something else.
Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
problems much easier to fix. I am excited to see it happening!
We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
but were just waiting for someone to do the work.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 03:24:21 | Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 03:19:45 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 03:24:21 | Re: [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dependency Patch |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 03:19:45 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |