| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |
| Date: | 2002-04-16 03:18:16 |
| Message-ID: | 3CBB97F8.22DD9441@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > Is there any consensus on it ?
>
> Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems; see TODO
> dependency checking section.
Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
So I've thought pg_depend is for something else.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-16 03:18:52 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-04-16 02:59:19 | Re: Stumbled upon a time bug... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-04-16 03:19:45 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-04-16 02:58:51 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |