Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Date: 2002-04-16 03:41:25
Message-ID: 3CBB9D65.EB181BE0@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > > > Is there any consensus on it ?
> > >
> > > Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems; see TODO
> > > dependency checking section.
> >
> > Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
> > e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
> > referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
> > So I've thought pg_depend is for something else.
>
> Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
> problems much easier to fix. I am excited to see it happening!
>
> We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
> but were just waiting for someone to do the work.

Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
What was the conclusion of the discussion ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-04-16 03:42:35 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-16 03:35:57 Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-04-16 03:42:35 Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-16 03:35:57 Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit