From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts |
Date: | 2002-04-16 03:41:25 |
Message-ID: | 3CBB9D65.EB181BE0@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For example, I don't understand what pg_depend intends.
> > > > Is there any consensus on it ?
> > >
> > > Uh, we know we want dependency checking to fix many problems; see TODO
> > > dependency checking section.
> >
> > Yes I know it's a very siginificant mechanism. It would contibute
> > e.g. to the DROP COLUMN implementation considerably but no one
> > referred to pg_depend in the recent discussion about DROP COLUMN.
> > So I've thought pg_depend is for something else.
>
> Oh, clearly pg_depend will fix many of our problems, or make some
> problems much easier to fix. I am excited to see it happening!
>
> We had a pg_depend discussion about 9 months ago and hashed out a plan
> but were just waiting for someone to do the work.
Probably I overlooked the conclusion then.
What was the conclusion of the discussion ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-16 03:42:35 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-16 03:35:57 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-04-16 03:42:35 | Re: [PATCHES] [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-04-16 03:35:57 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |