Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?
Date: 2002-04-12 22:23:51
Message-ID: 200204122223.g3CMNpf21976@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> You forgot who wrote that code originally. I feel alot
> better WITH the tests in place :-)
>
> And if it's merely to make sure the install worked, man who
> is doing source installations these days and runs the
> regression tests anyway? Most people throw in a RPM or the
> like, only a few serious users install from sources, and only
> a fistfull of them then runs regression.
>
> Aren't it mostly developers and distro-maintainers who use
> that directory? I think your entire point isn't just weak,
> IMNSVHO you don't really have a point.

It is my understanding that RPM does run that test. My main issue is
why does numeric have to be so much larger than the other tests? I have
not heard that explained.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-04-12 22:25:13 Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2002-04-12 22:15:29 Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?