Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date: 2001-11-09 04:31:19
Message-ID: 200111090431.fA94VJQ17068@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Doesn't bison deal with #include? I guess not. The only other way is
> > to make a gram.y.pre, and have Makefile do the inclusions in the proper
> > spot, and run that new gram.y through bison.
>
> I was hoping to avoid that sort of kluge ... surely the bison designers
> thought of include, and I'm just not seeing how it's done ...

What does #include do? Doesn't it work?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-11-09 04:35:25 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-09 04:19:26 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-11-09 04:32:30 Re: Enhanced index details using \d in psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-11-09 04:19:26 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification