| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Date: | 2001-11-09 04:19:26 |
| Message-ID: | 19122.1005279566@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Doesn't bison deal with #include? I guess not. The only other way is
> to make a gram.y.pre, and have Makefile do the inclusions in the proper
> spot, and run that new gram.y through bison.
I was hoping to avoid that sort of kluge ... surely the bison designers
thought of include, and I'm just not seeing how it's done ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-09 04:31:19 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-09 04:08:17 | Re: Small FK patch to deal with tables without oids |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-09 04:31:19 | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-09 04:08:17 | Re: Small FK patch to deal with tables without oids |