Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Date: 2001-11-09 04:35:25
Message-ID: 19264.1005280525@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> What does #include do? Doesn't it work?

AFAICT it's only allowed in the C-code sections of gram.y, from which
it's just transposed into the output .c file (as indeed you'd want;
you wouldn't want your header files expanded when bison is run).

I'm not seeing anything that supports inclusion of a file in the
grammar-productions portion of gram.y.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-11-09 04:46:21 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-11-09 04:31:19 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-11-09 04:46:21 Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-11-09 04:32:30 Re: Enhanced index details using \d in psql