From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Link to bug webpage |
Date: | 2001-08-21 15:11:07 |
Message-ID: | 200108211511.f7LFB7G03052@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Can someone point me to a bug that is _not_ on the TODO list? If not,
> > what does a complete bug database do for us except list reported bugs
> > and possible workarounds.
>
> Do you actually expect someone to go thru the 400+ items in the database
> and compare them to the TODO list? Seems to me that's something the
> maintainer of the TODO list would be doing. Can you point me to the form
> that gets something on the TODO list that the average user can use? Can
> you guarantee every bug will end up on the TODO list? Can you point me
> to the place on the TODO list when a user can look at to see if a bug has
> been fixed or even reported?
I was just asking. If I have been missing stuff, I can see more value
to a bug database.
> You're making more of an issue with all of this than there is. The TODO
> list has a purpose, as does CVS, as do the mailing lists, as does the
> regression database, as does the bugs database, as do the interactive
> docs, ...
OK, what value does a bug database have over a TODO list?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2001-08-21 15:13:13 | Re: Link to bug webpage |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-21 15:10:54 | Re: Link to bug webpage |