From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Link to bug webpage |
Date: | 2001-08-21 15:54:51 |
Message-ID: | 01082111545104.00989@lowen.wgcr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 11:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, what value does a bug database have over a TODO list?
The TODO list isn't just a list of bugs that need fixing.
A bug database is just that -- a list of bugs in existing features. While
Requests of Enhancements certainly can be accomodated through a bug database,
that isn't its primary function.
Bugzilla, while clunky for some things, does have some great benefits,
including the ability to discuss that bug in context; attach patches, logs,
stack traces, or whatnot; mark the bug's status; assign the bug to someone;
as well as many other features.
The TODO list as well as the mailing lists, while both great for what they
do, make it all too easy to loose a bug's context, being that both lists are
flat-files trying to track relational things. :-)
Red Hat makes mission-critical use of bugzilla running on Oracle. See
bugzilla.redhat.com. And ask the Red Hat people on these lists their
opinions of bugzilla.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-08-21 15:59:38 | Re: Link to bug webpage |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-21 15:49:42 | Re: Postgresql log analyzer |