| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Link to bug webpage |
| Date: | 2001-08-21 15:13:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20010821111111.F21976-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Yes, but we have to add items that don't come in through the database,
> > > and mark them as done/duplicates if we want it to be useful.
> >
> > Not necessarily. If someone discovers one that's not in the database
> > they'll add it. If it's already fixed it'll get closed out but will
> > still be in the database. It's not intended to be a todo/isdone list
> > or a development history reference. We have a TODO list and CVS for
> > that stuff.
>
> How do you communicate that to people looking at the content? Do you
> put in big letters at the top, "This list is not complete." The fact an
> items is missing from the list (new bug) is just as important as an item
> appearing on the list.
Huh? A list of bugs is only as complete as those submitting to it ... its
no more, or less, complete then a mailing list *shrug*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-21 15:17:42 | Re: Link to bug webpage |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-21 15:11:07 | Re: Link to bug webpage |