From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |
Date: | 2001-05-15 01:17:00 |
Message-ID: | 200105150117.f4F1H0w07004@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
[ Charset US-ASCII unsupported, converting... ]
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Why did you remove indisclustered?
> > >
> > > Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> > > doesn't seem like a good idea ...
> >
> > I patched the clients also. Is that a problem?
> >
>
> Please don't reflect the server side changes in clients
> directly. Even clients in beta have to be able to talk
> to existent servers. As for removing indisclustered from
> current psqlodbc, it seems to have no problem but I'm not
> sure.
It isn't a problem. The new ODBC version doesn't reference the column
anymore. The value was meaningless anyway. When we finally remove it
from pg_index, it would affect old clients, but that removal may be
years away.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-05-15 01:20:26 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2001-05-15 01:11:59 | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |