Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl
Date: 2001-05-15 01:11:59
Message-ID: 3B00825F.1CD33015@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Why did you remove indisclustered?
> >
> > Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> > doesn't seem like a good idea ...
>
> I patched the clients also. Is that a problem?
>

Please don't reflect the server side changes in clients
directly. Even clients in beta have to be able to talk
to existent servers. As for removing indisclustered from
current psqlodbc, it seems to have no problem but I'm not
sure.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-15 01:17:00 Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-15 01:09:14 Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl