From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pggeneral <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps |
Date: | 2001-05-15 01:20:26 |
Message-ID: | 3B00845A.F7B7E0C9@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
> That'd be an improvement. Unfortunately, the ISO 8601 standard is not
> much more readable:
> 2001-05-13T10:19:44,085-05:00
> That's a literal 'T' designating the time portion and a comma separating
> seconds and milliseconds (http://www.iso.ch/markete/8601.pdf)
No disagreement here, but f-y'all-i the standard says that the 'T' is
allowed to be omitted if acceptable to both parties handling the data.
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 02:23:48 | Re: Wal logs continued... |
Previous Message | Ken | 2001-05-15 00:02:12 | Re: In a fix: lost superuser |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 03:06:06 | Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-05-15 01:17:00 | Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl |