Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pggeneral <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: microsecond log timestamps
Date: 2001-05-15 01:20:26
Message-ID: 3B00845A.F7B7E0C9@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

> That'd be an improvement. Unfortunately, the ISO 8601 standard is not
> much more readable:
> 2001-05-13T10:19:44,085-05:00
> That's a literal 'T' designating the time portion and a comma separating
> seconds and milliseconds (http://www.iso.ch/markete/8601.pdf)

No disagreement here, but f-y'all-i the standard says that the 'T' is
allowed to be omitted if acceptable to both parties handling the data.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 02:23:48 Re: Wal logs continued...
Previous Message Ken 2001-05-15 00:02:12 Re: In a fix: lost superuser

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-15 03:06:06 Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-15 01:17:00 Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl