Re: Slashdot discussion

From: Andrew Sullivan <sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca>
To: user Postgresql ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slashdot discussion
Date: 2000-07-11 13:04:01
Message-ID: 20000711090400.A10744@bpl.on.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 12:24:20AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
> number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
> easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install.

I've noticed that, too, but having installed them both (from source and from
packages), I have to say they're both "a pain" to install, at least as much
as anything is. Of course they are. They're complicated, and they're set
up to be flexible in installation on many machines.

It occurs to me, though, that many people may not install from source.
Maybe the RPMs are better for MySQL? I don't use 'em, so I don't know.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan Computer Services
<sullivana(at)bpl(dot)on(dot)ca> Burlington Public Library
+1 905 639 3611 x158 2331 New Street
Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7R 1J4

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-11 13:09:51 Re: pg_backup symlink?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2000-07-11 12:58:38 Re: [GENERAL] Slashdot discussion

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-11 13:07:27 Re: Patch for pg_dump
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-11 13:02:37 Re: postgres 7.2 features.