| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for pg_dump |
| Date: | 2000-07-11 13:07:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200007111307.JAA27392@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Applied. I didn't have a copy of this in my mailbox, so either I lost
it, or it didn't make it to the list.
[ text/enriched is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN ]
>
>
> This was sent a while ago, perhaps it slipped though unnoticed.
>
>
> >>>>
>
> <excerpt>At 21:13 9/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >
>
> >Also I'm not real sure that the unused field will be "-" for all the
>
> >other languages --- but if that's true you could make it work. Not
>
> >hardwiring the language OIDs would definitely be a Good Thing.
>
> >
>
>
> Done. In backend/commands/define.c unused field is set to '-' for the
> moment.
>
>
> A patch for CVS is attached, and I have amended my BLOB dumping version
> appropriately.
>
>
> </excerpt><<<<<<<<
>
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
[ text/enriched is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN ]
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Philip Warner | __---_____
>
> Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
>
> (A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
>
> Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
>
> Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
>
> Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
>
> | --________--
>
> PGP key available upon request, | /
>
> and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-11 13:08:41 | Re: postmaster errors with index on temp table? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2000-07-11 13:04:01 | Re: Slashdot discussion |