Re: setproctitle() no longer used?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Date: 2000-05-11 15:32:00
Message-ID: 200005111532.LAA13810@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, 11 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Oh. Can you look at the setproctitle code on your platform and see
> > > how it implements it?
> >
> > In the end I believe we'll make the world a better place if we're using
> > setproctitle when available. Sendmail does. If someone really complains
> > about speed loss we can always make it an option not to use it, but I
> > won't buy into that until I see some profiling evidence.
>
> Its a rare thing, but definitely agree with Peter here :)

I think I do too. Let me add this to the TODO list:

* use setproctitle() if it exists for 'ps' display of status

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Perdue 2000-05-11 15:33:31 Re: Eternal vacuuming....
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-11 15:28:12 Re: setproctitle() no longer used?