Re: setproctitle() no longer used?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Date: 2000-05-11 15:28:12
Message-ID: 200005111528.LAA13719@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On Wed, 10 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Oh. Can you look at the setproctitle code on your platform and see
> > how it implements it?
>
> In the end I believe we'll make the world a better place if we're using
> setproctitle when available. Sendmail does. If someone really complains
> about speed loss we can always make it an option not to use it, but I
> won't buy into that until I see some profiling evidence.

Good point. I just did it because it worked on BSD, and I don't have
setproctitle. If sendmail does it by default if setproctitle exists,
maybe that is the way to go.

BSDI 4.01 doesn't have setproctitle, but I don't need it because I can
just assign anything in there.

I saw the FreeBSD code, and it seems they have added a sysctl() call in
the library setproctitle code to handle it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-11 15:32:00 Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-11 15:25:47 Re: setproctitle() no longer used?