Re: setproctitle() no longer used?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Date: 2000-05-11 11:48:13
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0005110847560.777-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 11 May 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Wed, 10 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Oh. Can you look at the setproctitle code on your platform and see
> > how it implements it?
>
> In the end I believe we'll make the world a better place if we're using
> setproctitle when available. Sendmail does. If someone really complains
> about speed loss we can always make it an option not to use it, but I
> won't buy into that until I see some profiling evidence.

Its a rare thing, but definitely agree with Peter here :)

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-11 11:49:18 Re: Patches list broken?
Previous Message SAKAIDA Masaaki 2000-05-11 11:05:53 COPY BINARY to STDOUT