Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Date: 2017-06-15 16:38:24
Message-ID: 1c07c9a6-b56f-fe67-63a5-6913e78df1f6@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 06/15/2017 07:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
>> Hmm. Strictly speaking there's no need to update the dependency when
>> changing opaque into cstring. Because cstring is a pinned type,
>> recordDependency will do nothing for it.
>
>> But in any case, I think it'd be better and simpler to fix the
>> dependency in SetFunctionArgType() and SetFunctionReturnType() functions
>> themselves. They're the ones that change the type, they ought to be
>> responsible for fixing the dependency too. See attached.
>
> Yeah, Heikki's version looks good to me.
>
> Heikki, are you going to commit/backpatch this, or do you want me to?

I can do it, thanks.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mark.manley 2017-06-15 22:06:06 BUG #14709: inconsistent answers with foreign data wrappers to mysql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-15 16:31:40 Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types