Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist
Date: 2024-10-25 16:41:39
Message-ID: 19c62e62c79b727d2c9a82eaeecfea5017001099.camel@oopsware.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Freitag, dem 22.03.2024 um 15:20 +0100 schrieb Bernd Helmle:
> > FWIW it would be nice at least port tests from commit that I
> > referenced upthread.
> > Nowadays we have injection points, so these tests can be much more
> > stable.
>
> Alright, that's a reasonable point. I will look into this. Did you
> see
> other important things missing?
>
> Changed status back to "Waiting On Author".

So this is a new rebased version of the patches including regression
tests with default (sortsupport) and buffering behavior. I split up the
tests for buffering vs. non-buffering but kept them basically the same
for testing the index builts.

I've registered this patch in the upcoming commitfest again for another
review round

Thanks
Bernd

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7.2-Add-GIST-sortsupport-btree-gist.patch text/x-patch 285.7 KB
v7.2-Add-GIST-sortsupport-rangetypes.patch text/x-patch 4.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2024-10-25 17:07:44 Improve error messages for database object stats manipulation functions during recovery
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2024-10-25 16:37:09 Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?