Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?
Date: 2024-10-25 16:37:09
Message-ID: CAAKRu_bQFd=cgNMHED0VUPfV-fUcdsj2SBxRYD5DZmmJLg387A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 10:29 AM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Tom suggested off-list that if rs_cindex can't be zero, then it should
> be unsigned. I checked the other scan types using the
> HeapScanDescData, and it seems none of them use values of rs_cindex or
> rs_ntuples < 0. As such, here is a patch making both rs_ntuples and
> rs_cindex unsigned.

I realized one of the asserts was superfluous. Please find v3 attached.

- Melanie

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Make-rs_cindex-and-rs_ntuples-unsigned.patch text/x-patch 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2024-10-25 16:41:39 Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-10-25 15:48:29 Re: Fix C23 compiler warning