Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?
Date: 1999-12-11 02:44:52
Message-ID: 199912110244.VAA11673@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:
>
> > The recent QNX patches have broken current sources. I think
> > maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> > Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> > which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> > But it ain't defined anywhere. Major lossage ensues.
>
> ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
> LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

We have an LDFLAGS, but this for using ld to generate SUBSYS.o. Not to
be used in normal ld linking use.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-11 02:45:14 Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-11 02:42:19 Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql