Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?
Date: 1999-12-11 02:01:43
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.20.9912110130200.1875-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:

> The recent QNX patches have broken current sources. I think
> maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> But it ain't defined anywhere. Major lossage ensues.

ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Holloway 1999-12-11 02:32:49 Industrial-Strength Logging
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-11 02:01:29 Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load