Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file
Date: 1999-11-19 04:16:30
Message-ID: 199911190416.XAA24436@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> src/include/catalog/catversion.h.
> >>
> >> I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
> >> be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
> >> But maybe it belongs somewhere else...
>
> > I just couldn't find it. I looked in include only because version.h.in
> > was there.
>
> You could certainly make a case for moving it to src/include. If
> you want to do that, I won't object.

No, seems fine there.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-19 04:19:23 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-19 04:16:13 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert