Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file
Date: 1999-11-19 04:06:58
Message-ID: 840.942984418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> src/include/catalog/catversion.h.
>>
>> I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
>> be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
>> But maybe it belongs somewhere else...

> I just couldn't find it. I looked in include only because version.h.in
> was there.

You could certainly make a case for moving it to src/include. If
you want to do that, I won't object.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-11-19 04:14:35 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-11-19 03:51:20 Re: [HACKERS] Hash Join is very slooow in some cases