| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL |
| Date: | 1999-11-19 04:19:23 |
| Message-ID: | 199911190419.XAA24590@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > We currently only allow the words PRIMARY KEY on a SERIAL column.
>
> Say what? There are ColConstraintElem and ConstraintElem productions
> for PRIMARY KEY ... are they broken?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Oh, I see it now. The grammer seems to only support it in SERIAL, but I
see it works now. I guess i am surprised SERIAL PRIMARY creates the
index and sequence, while INTEGER PRIMARY only creates the index.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-11-19 04:27:07 | Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-19 04:16:30 | Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file |