| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits |
| Date: | 1999-10-20 17:41:27 |
| Message-ID: | 199910201741.NAA12484@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> AFAICT, the last remaining textual length limits in the backend are a
> couple of fixed-size buffers in rewriteDefine.c and array support.
> In the next few days (probably this weekend) I intend to fix that code
> and then remove all #define constants that have anything to do with
> string length limits. (Tentative hit list is attached.)
>
> Great!
>
> Jan, does this mean that we can also lose the "rewrite string too big"
> problem with rules?
>
> That would be a huge win.
No. We have to have long tuples.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-20 17:57:12 | Book on web site |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-20 17:41:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] |