Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?]

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?]
Date: 1999-10-20 17:41:04
Message-ID: 199910201741.NAA12475@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Oh, I didn't realize they had a binary-only distribution that was
> _different_ from the source distribution.
>
> DIFFERENT is not relevant. I could today ship a binary verion of
> postgresql in its present form as a proprietary product with no source
> code. No license problems arise from doing so. Allowing GPL code
> into the base system causes the problem.

Does GPL require the source to be included, or just available for free?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-20 17:41:27 Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits
Previous Message Brook Milligan 1999-10-20 17:18:08 Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits