Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directoriesh

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directoriesh
Date: 1999-10-12 15:35:07
Message-ID: 199910121535.LAA21501@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > rm?
> > >
> > > Well it's a last resort I've used on one of my home cvs trees, but it
> > > does loose the archived stuff under that directory.
> > >
> > > Peter
> >
> > Yes, but in most cases we don't care. That stuff is very old. I don't
> > know of any directory that has no valid files that needs to be saved.
>
> Why would we want to remove it in the first place? If its been 'deleted',
> it won't show up unless you want it to (cvs update -APd removed old
> files/directories)...
>
> Oops, careful in the above, it also removed any 'sticky/branch' tags...

I just thought we could fiddle with CVS to remove the stuff totally. No
real need to, though. I just thought it would be confusing for people
who didn't do -P, or people managing CVSROOT directly.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-12 15:36:28 Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release
Previous Message Peter Mount 1999-10-12 15:33:10 RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release