RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release
Date: 1999-10-12 15:33:10
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C25E6CA@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'll check it tonight, so you should know in about 3 hours.

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: 12 October 1999 16:24
To: The Hermit Hacker
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Thomas Lockhart; Postgres Hackers List
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> On the other hand, is there a reason to be in a rush to put out
6.5.3?
>> I didn't think we had many important changes from 6.5.2 yet.

> v6.5.3, I believe, was because PgAccess somehow got removed in v6.5.2
:(

Ah, right, I'd forgotten that. OK, we need a 6.5.3.

It sounds like Peter wants another day to check JDBC though...

regards, tom lane

************

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-12 15:35:07 Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directoriesh
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-10-12 15:32:01 RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release