| From: | Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directoriesh |
| Date: | 1999-10-13 14:08:36 |
| Message-ID: | emacs-smtp-24855-14340-37476-702327@export.andrew.cmu.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Then <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> spoke up and said:
> > Why would we want to remove it in the first place? If its been 'deleted',
> > it won't show up unless you want it to (cvs update -APd removed old
> > files/directories)...
> >
> > Oops, careful in the above, it also removed any 'sticky/branch' tags...
>
> I just thought we could fiddle with CVS to remove the stuff totally. No
> real need to, though. I just thought it would be confusing for people
> who didn't do -P, or people managing CVSROOT directly.
There is only one good reason for "really" pruning those old
directories out of the source tree: revision purging. If you purge
all revisions of the files that live in those directories (so that
they really *are* empty), then removing the directories is a good idea.
--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-13 14:18:00 | Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-10-13 13:51:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again |