Re: [HACKERS] 6.6

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.6
Date: 1999-09-15 18:11:15
Message-ID: 199909151811.OAA28107@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I would like to see something from Jan too...
> My opinion is that RI _MUST_ be implemented in 6.6.
> There are 3 ways:
>
> 1. Using deferrable rules/statement level triggers.
> 2. Using transaction log (to read changes made in
> parent/child tables and check RI constraints).
> 3. Using DIRTY READ in refint.c
>
> I hope to be able to do 2. or 3., though it would be much
> better to have 1. (with statement level triggers) implemented by Jan.

Uh, oh. Vadim has thrown down the hachet on a 6.6 _must_ _have_ item.

(I agree with him, but am glad I didn't have to do it.)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

  • 6.6 at 1999-09-15 05:46:15 from Vadim Mikheev

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 1999-09-15 23:49:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message Michael Dexter 1999-09-15 16:20:58 Comparison Suggestion