From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 |
Date: | 1999-09-15 18:11:15 |
Message-ID: | 199909151811.OAA28107@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I would like to see something from Jan too...
> My opinion is that RI _MUST_ be implemented in 6.6.
> There are 3 ways:
>
> 1. Using deferrable rules/statement level triggers.
> 2. Using transaction log (to read changes made in
> parent/child tables and check RI constraints).
> 3. Using DIRTY READ in refint.c
>
> I hope to be able to do 2. or 3., though it would be much
> better to have 1. (with statement level triggers) implemented by Jan.
Uh, oh. Vadim has thrown down the hachet on a 6.6 _must_ _have_ item.
(I agree with him, but am glad I didn't have to do it.)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ryan Kirkpatrick | 1999-09-15 23:49:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 |
Previous Message | Michael Dexter | 1999-09-15 16:20:58 | Comparison Suggestion |