Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5?

From: Sascha Schumann <sascha(at)schumann(dot)2ns(dot)de>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5?
Date: 1999-06-18 10:56:08
Message-ID: 19990618125608.D2026@schumann.2ns.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 02:22:13AM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > > ... under a Linux system ...
> > > ^^^^^
> > > Ah, finally seen the light...
> > > You didn't expect _that_ to go unnoticed, did you?
> > I'm getting paid *well* to put up with it :)
>
> Well, that story will work for a while...
>
> > > Yes, "nobody" *is* using the system. You sure you don't have a web
> > > server or something? Anything else running as "nobody"?
> > Ya, but no connections through it yet...does PHP auto-open connections to
> > the backend as a sort of cache/pool?
>
> afaik, yes. Haven't run it myself though. I imagine that there are
> tunable parameters for that sort of thing.

No, no auto-open connections. From the database name (imp), I
would guess that you are running the IMAP web frontend named IMP
which is using persistent connections to the database - these
aren't closed automatically, so they hang around idle.

--

Regards,

Sascha Schumann
Consultant

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Good 1999-06-18 11:04:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: UnixWare
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 1999-06-18 09:04:01 Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item