From: | Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item |
Date: | 1999-06-18 09:04:01 |
Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B3A3@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> (It is true that there are a few extensions to
> the SQL syntax which are holdovers from the PostQuel language, which
> explains a few odd features in the parser.)
>
> Would you prefer that we do nothing until I have a chance to research
> this some more, or is someone going to dive in?
>
IMHO a tablename after select is only valid if there is a point and
attribute or function after the tablename because postgresql handles
queries of the form:
select t1.eval;
select t1.*;
Where eval can be a column of the t1 table or a function accepting
one opaque argument. The function is automatically passed each
row of t1. This is the important feature.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sascha Schumann | 1999-06-18 10:56:08 | Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-06-18 08:12:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes |