Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item

From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New TODO item
Date: 1999-06-18 09:04:01
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B3A3@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> (It is true that there are a few extensions to
> the SQL syntax which are holdovers from the PostQuel language, which
> explains a few odd features in the parser.)
>
> Would you prefer that we do nothing until I have a chance to research
> this some more, or is someone going to dive in?
>
IMHO a tablename after select is only valid if there is a point and
attribute or function after the tablename because postgresql handles
queries of the form:

select t1.eval;
select t1.*;

Where eval can be a column of the t1 table or a function accepting
one opaque argument. The function is automatically passed each
row of t1. This is the important feature.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sascha Schumann 1999-06-18 10:56:08 Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-06-18 08:12:14 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure wishes