Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jamest(at)math(dot)ksu(dot)edu (James Thompson)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?
Date: 1999-03-11 17:37:05
Message-ID: 199903111737.MAA18727@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > The only thing I know of is that the new MVCC code doesn't vacuum
> > properly yet. It does vacuum, I just suspect is does not know how to
> > prevent vacuuming of rows that are being viewed by other backends.
> >
> > Perhaps Vadim can comment on that.
>
> So if other backends are not active then vacuum works OK? Nightly vacuums
> on inactive databases are OK? If so then its "good enough for government
> work" :)

My guess is that this is true.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-11 17:42:53 Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe
Previous Message Clark Evans 1999-03-11 17:36:06 Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe