Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?

From: James Thompson <jamest(at)math(dot)ksu(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?
Date: 1999-03-11 17:28:27
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.10.9903111124350.2232-100000@hobbes.math.ksu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The only thing I know of is that the new MVCC code doesn't vacuum
> properly yet. It does vacuum, I just suspect is does not know how to
> prevent vacuuming of rows that are being viewed by other backends.
>
> Perhaps Vadim can comment on that.

So if other backends are not active then vacuum works OK? Nightly vacuums
on inactive databases are OK? If so then its "good enough for government
work" :)

->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
James Thompson 138 Cardwell Hall Manhattan, Ks 66506 785-532-0561
Kansas State University Department of Mathematics
->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-03-11 17:31:28 Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-11 17:18:43 Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?