From: | Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | James Thompson <jamest(at)math(dot)ksu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS? |
Date: | 1999-03-15 18:55:37 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.04.9903151855200.16622-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > The only thing I know of is that the new MVCC code doesn't vacuum
> > > properly yet. It does vacuum, I just suspect is does not know how to
> > > prevent vacuuming of rows that are being viewed by other backends.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Vadim can comment on that.
> >
> > So if other backends are not active then vacuum works OK? Nightly vacuums
> > on inactive databases are OK? If so then its "good enough for government
> > work" :)
>
> My guess is that this is true.
It is true for me ;-)
--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-03-15 19:12:08 | Odd question... |
Previous Message | secret | 1999-03-15 18:51:54 | Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance) |