Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: James Thompson <jamest(at)math(dot)ksu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What unresolved issues are in CVS?
Date: 1999-03-15 18:55:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.04.9903151855200.16622-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > The only thing I know of is that the new MVCC code doesn't vacuum
> > > properly yet. It does vacuum, I just suspect is does not know how to
> > > prevent vacuuming of rows that are being viewed by other backends.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Vadim can comment on that.
> >
> > So if other backends are not active then vacuum works OK? Nightly vacuums
> > on inactive databases are OK? If so then its "good enough for government
> > work" :)
>
> My guess is that this is true.

It is true for me ;-)

--
Peter T Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-03-15 19:12:08 Odd question...
Previous Message secret 1999-03-15 18:51:54 Re: postmaster dies (was Re: Very disappointing performance)