Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg

From: Michael Meskes <Michael(dot)Meskes(at)usa(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
Date: 1999-01-22 07:39:10
Message-ID: 19990122083910.D2827@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 05:06:56PM -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > Applied...but why isn't/wasn't it posted tothe patches list instead of
> > here? :(
>
> Perhaps like me he doesn't subscribe to patches and you don't accept
> postings to mailing lists from non-subscribers. Personally I find

Correct. In fact I even tried subscribe in the process of changing my
hackers and interfaces account but am still waiting for Marc to approve
this.

> the CVS update summaries informational enough and prefer not to have
> to wade through the raw patches. Is the assumption that those that
> submit should also be peer reviewing?

That one is also my problem. As it is now I get way too much email and
cannot cope with lots of patches I will delete anyway.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)gmx(dot)net | Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1999-01-22 07:42:54 Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1999-01-22 07:37:30 Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again