Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again

From: Michael Meskes <Michael(dot)Meskes(at)usa(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT in gram.y again
Date: 1999-01-22 07:37:30
Message-ID: 19990122083730.C2827@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 03:08:20PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I still wonder if the for-update-tests in SelectStmt: are okay. Shouldn't
> > the test check for intersect_present=TRUE instead of intersectClause !=
> > NULL?
>
> Looks like they are the same. Both are true or false.

But I think intersectClause is set to op regardless if there is an intersect
clause at all. Or did I miss something?

Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(dot)Meskes(at)gmx(dot)net | Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1999-01-22 07:39:10 Re: [HACKERS] more patches for ecpg
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1999-01-22 07:36:41 Re: [HACKERS] ecpg docs